Hi there
I've been reading/listening to a few (a lot?) of those silly little (some of them are not so little) revenge stories on You Tube. They're usually about a poor sad young woman who has a 'golden child' sister. The sister is spoilt rotten by everyone in the family. Even after this spoilt sister has bled through her parents' money and naturally, her sister's money, this woman wants more.
There's usually a come-uppance for both the golden child and the parents. The poor sad sister who by now is a millionaire - many times over = gets her revenge.
I love to laugh over the words that come up on the screen to replicate the narration. Here's just a few of the hilarious sentences that I discovered over a three-story listen -
. The efficient (officiant?) spoke at the ceremony
. Write (right?) this way sir. Follow me
. I'm not paying another scent (cent?)
. You are not our pier (peer?)
. She's a 128-year old (28-year old?) and she's made all that money?
. I stopped so abruptly that no-one (Noah?) bumped into my side.
It's all AI-generated, of course. And even though the story is told in english there's occasionally an out-of-context word in another language. And the plotline aways has mistakes; it's why I continue diving into the stories. For chuckles. For instance, a character might throw her handbag out a window, but a second or so later, she's still sitting at the dining table and rifling through the bag (usually to flourish forth a letter of revelation about how her family have been dipping into her accounts for years).
How sad for real authors who spend such a long time writing a story that's full of emotion, action, realism and originality, to be confronted by these silly copy-cat, mistake-ridden, flat revenge stories?
And how awful that it's taken me so long to realise that I shouldn't be reading them, even if it has been just for fun.
In the future, AI will be able to edit their mistakes out, re-write with more intellect, and the stories will sound natural, plausible. We will get used to it, and true authors will be no more ...
... unless, that is, the public stands up against the use of AI-generated material.






